29 Greater Noida UP-RERA Registrations, and the Company That Filed Each One

Why the registered promoter is the first thing to check on a Greater Noida project

The name on the hoarding is a marketing name. The name on the UP-RERA registration is a legal entity, and it is the one that matters to you in three specific places: the builder-buyer agreement you sign, the account your money is instructed to, and the registration itself. If those three do not name the same entity, that is something to resolve before a rupee moves, not after.

Across these 29 Greater Noida registrations, the register makes the point better than any argument could. Twenty-nine registrations, twenty-nine different registered promoter entities. Not one company filed two of them. And on 18 of the 29, the entity's name and the project's name have no word in common. That is not unusual, and it is not a warning sign: a separate entity per project is ordinary structure in Indian real estate, and it is exactly what the register is designed to record. It just means that recognising the brand tells you nothing about which company holds the registration.

So the useful question is not "who is the builder". It is "which company filed this registration, and does that company appear on my paperwork". The register answers the first half. The table below is that answer for all 29 rows.

If you want the method rather than the evidence, we already wrote it up separately: Which Company Is Actually Behind the Project You Are Buying? walks through the brand-versus-entity idea and how to search for it. This page is its evidence set for Greater Noida, and the two are meant to be read together.

What "Greater Noida" means on the register, and why it is not one place

Before the table, a caveat you deserve up front, because it changes how you should use the table. The register holds no corridor field and no sector field. What it does hold is State (Uttar Pradesh on all 29), District (Gautam Buddha Nagar on all 29), one Tehsil value - 17 of the 29 read Gautam Buddha Nagar and 12 read Dadri - and then a single free-text address string per project, typed by the promoter at filing. Below district, everything anyone can say about where a project sits comes from reading that address string.

And that string is not standardised. On these 29 rows, the same sector is printed several different ways. Sector 12 appears on four rows, spelled Sector 12, sector 12 and SECTOR 12. Sector 10 appears as Sector-10 and SECTOR-10. Delta 2 appears as Sector-Delta -2, Sector-Delta-2 and SECTOR DELTA 2. Only 12 of the 29 addresses carry a six-digit postal code at all - 201310 on six rows, 201318 on three, 201308 on two and 201305 on one - and the other 17 print none. Latitude and longitude are blank on all 29, so there are no coordinates to map.

Which is why we print the register's address string in full on every row of the table, exactly as filed, spelling and punctuation untouched. You should be able to see what the record actually says rather than take our word for which bucket a project belongs in.

The 29 registrations, grouped by where the register address puts them

Grouped, the set stops looking like one market and starts looking like several. Here is each group, with every project named, and nothing said about any of them beyond where the register puts them.

One more thing the addresses carry, and one thing they do not. They carry a plot code: GH on 9 rows, C on 9, SLC on 5, B on 2, and a plain plot number with no letter prefix on the remaining 4. We print those codes exactly as the register prints them and we stop there, because the register does not define them anywhere in the record we hold. What the code means for land use on a specific plot is a question for the allotment letter and the sanctioned plan from the development authority, not for a register field that does not exist.

All 29 registrations in one table

Seven columns, 29 rows, sorted by registration date with the oldest filing first. Every cell is a field the promoter filed on the UP-RERA register, reproduced as filed. Nothing in this table scores, orders or compares one developer against another. The one editorial step is that the sector or locality shown in bold is the fragment we lifted out of the register's own address string, which is printed in full directly beneath it. Each project name links to that project's record page on our register mirror, upreratracker.com, if you want to see the row on its own.

Four things are true of every row and are therefore not columns. All 29 are filed under project type New - the register's project type field holds only New or Ongoing, and not one of these 29 reads Ongoing. All 29 carry a well-formed registration date, a well-formed declared completion date and a named applicant type, with no blanks and no parse artefacts anywhere in the seven fields. Applicant type splits 21 Company, 4 Partnership Firm, 3 Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and 1 Societies. And the proposed period each promoter filed runs from 45 to 61 months, with 13 of the 29 filed at exactly 60.

Read by registration year, the set is 10 filings in 2024, 13 in 2025 and 6 in 2026 up to the read date. Read by declared completion year, it is 1 in 2027, 3 in 2028, 9 in 2029, 12 in 2030 and 4 in 2031. The earliest declared completion in the set is 2 October 2027 (GROUP HOUSING CGEWHO PHASE II) and the latest is 8 April 2031 (Lifestyle Central). Those are the promoters' own filed declarations and nothing more.

So which company is the registered promoter on the project you are being shown?

Look it up in the table, and expect it to differ from the marketing name the project is sold under. On 18 of the 29 rows, the registered promoter's name and the project's name have no word in common. Here is the test we used, so you can rerun it: strip only the company-form words Private, Limited, Ltd, Pvt and LLP from the promoter name, then check whether any remaining word also appears in the project name. That test is deliberately generous - it counts a shared common word like "housing" or "greens" as a match - so 18 is the floor, not the ceiling.

The 11 rows where a word does carry across are Ashtech Presidential Towers (ASHTECH INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED), Eldeco La Vida Bella (ELDECO REAL ESTATE LIMITED), Godrej Arden (GODREJ PROPERTIES LIMITED), Irish Platinum (IRISH BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED), Kaveri City Centre-2 (KAVERI ELITE INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED), LEVANTE METRO WALK (LEVANTE PROJECTS), Nilay Square (NILAY INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED), SHAGUN CITY CENTER (SHAGUN MART LLP), Sobha Aurum (SOBHA LIMITED), plus two that match only on a generic word: GROUP HOUSING CGEWHO PHASE II (CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES WELFARE HOUSING ORGAN) and The Peridona C-1 Jaypee Greens (CRC GREENS PRIVATE LIMITED).

On the other 18, the register holds a name you would not guess from the signage. A few, straight off the rows above:

• LEGACY BY GAURS is registered to GOLF HORIZON LLP.
• ACE HANEI is registered to LA BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED.
• NIRALA DIADEM is registered to PARTH BUILTECH PRIVATE LIMITED.
• MIGSUN DELTA STREET is registered to MAHALUXMI INFRAHOME PVT LTD.
• SKA DESTINY ONE is registered to PRASU DEVELOPERS LLP, and SKA ESTATE to a differently named entity again, PRASU HOME LLP.
• KB Central is registered to AVORA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED, and KB West Walk to SHREE KUNJ BIHARIJI REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED.
• Delta Square is registered to BABA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, and Delta Square 1 to BABAGREEN INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED.
• Eros Sampoornam 3 is registered to AJAY ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED, and Palm Olympia PH 3 to SAM INDIA ABHIMANYU HOUSING.

None of that is a problem in itself. It is how the register is built, and a separate entity per project is normal. What matters is that three names should agree: the entity named as promoter in your builder-buyer agreement, the entity your payment instruction names, and the entity on the registration. The register gives you the third one for free. The KB Central / KB West Walk and Delta Square / Delta Square 1 pairs above are why the registration number is the safer thing to quote: two projects with almost the same marketing name can sit under two entirely separate registrations and two entirely separate companies.

Four checks to run before you pay anything

All four are answerable from the register alone, in about ten minutes, using the table above and up-rera.in. None of them requires anyone's permission and none of them requires us.

1. Match the entity across three documents. Write down the registered promoter from the table. Then find the promoter entity named in your draft agreement, and the entity named on the payment instruction you have been given. All three should be the same legal name, spelled the same way. If one of them differs, that is the question to ask in writing before anything else is discussed.
2. Search by registration number, never by project name. Take the UPRERAPRJ number from the table to up-rera.in and search the registered-projects list on the number. The number resolves to exactly one record. Project names and sector strings do not: this set alone contains two registrations named Delta Square and Delta Square 1, two named KB Central and KB West Walk, and three different spellings of Sector 12 across four rows.
3. Read the register's address against the address you were shown. Pull up the address on the record and compare it with the plot number on the brochure, the site you visited and the location pin you were sent. If the register's address names a different sector or a different plot, ask which one is the registered project before you go further. The register's own address strings vary in spelling, casing and level of detail, which is why this comparison is done field by field against the record rather than by eye.
4. Read the declared completion date off the register, not off a brochure. The register carries a Declared Date Of Completion filed by the promoter itself. Note what it says, note that it is a declaration made at registration rather than a promise about handover, and then get whatever timeline you are being told separately committed in writing in your own agreement. Do not let a brochure date and a register date sit unreconciled in your head.

The framework, in one line: if all four checks agree, you have a project whose paperwork is internally consistent and you can move on to the commercial questions. If one of them disagrees - most often the entity name, occasionally the address - stop at that one and get it answered in writing. A disagreement is not a verdict on anybody. It is simply an unanswered question, and unanswered questions are cheap to fix before payment and expensive to fix after.

How to verify every row yourself, and what this page deliberately leaves out

The denominators, and the date the register was read

Everything above comes from our own mirror of the UP-RERA register for Gautam Buddha Nagar. The mirror holds 966 project registrations. Its most recent scrape entry is stamped 29 July 2026, and that is the read date printed throughout this page. It is not today's date, and we are not going to write that it is.

Of those 966 registrations, 148 carry a registration date of 1 January 2024 or later, and 143 of those 148 carry a text address at all. Of the 818 registrations filed before 2024, only 41 carry a text address. That gap is the reason this page starts at 2024: for the earlier years, the register mirror simply does not hold enough address text to place projects honestly, and we would rather publish a scope you can check than a total you cannot. Within the 143, 35 print a Greater Noida token in the address and 29 of those 35 are the set on this page, with the six exclusions named earlier by project.

Verifying a row

Open up-rera.in, go to the registered-projects search, and search on the registration number. Read the promoter name, the applicant type, the project address, the registration date and the declared date of completion straight off the record, and compare them with the row here. If a field on the live record differs from ours, the live record wins and we would genuinely like to be told, because a dated snapshot that nobody corrects is worth less than one that gets corrected. Every project name in the table also links to that project's record page on upreratracker.com, our own register mirror, which shows the same fields laid out one project at a time.

If reading the number itself is the part you want explained - what the digits mean, and why the format changed - that is a separate piece: How to Read a UP-RERA Registration Number. And if you want the four-step portal walkthrough with screenshots rather than a description, it is at How to Check a UP RERA Registration Yourself, in 4 Steps.

What is deliberately not on this page

• No land-use classification. The register's project type field holds only New or Ongoing, and there is no residential-versus-commercial field anywhere in the 24 fields the record carries. Any page that gives you one has produced it from somewhere other than the register. We print the plot codes verbatim and send you to the allotment letter for what they mean.
• No map, no coordinates. Latitude and longitude are blank on all 29 rows. A pin would have to be guessed, so there is no pin.
• No price, size, configuration, launch status or possession. The register holds none of these fields. Putting them in this table would mean sourcing some cells off-register, which would break the one property that makes the table worth quoting: every cell is a field the promoter filed.
• No promoter phone number or email address. The register does hold them. We do not republish them.
• No arithmetic against today's date. A declared completion date is printed exactly as filed and left alone. No countdown, no months-away, no due-in.
• No ranking, score, shortlist or best-of among the 29 registrations on this page. There is no column that orders these developers against each other, and there is no sentence on this page about whether any of these projects is a good buy. Sorting is by registration date only, and that is stated on the table.
• No claim of completeness. This is 29 registrations from 2024 onward whose register address places them in this corridor, read on 29 July 2026. It is not every project in Greater Noida and it never claims to be.

Two neighbouring pages, if this is not quite the question you came with. Greater Noida: plots and apartments is the desk's ordinary service page for the city rather than a register read. And Yamuna Expressway RERA Numbers is this page's sibling for the YEIDA corridor, which is a different set of projects entirely.

Frequently asked questions

Vidit Kaushik

Civil Engineering, BITS Pilani · UP-RERA Agent UPRERAAGT000309/01/2026 · Founder, Vidastu Developers Pvt. Ltd.