Insights · The Register, Counted

SKA on the register: 5 filings, 5 companies

Q: Which two SKA promoter names are almost the same?

Prasu Developers LLP and Prasu Home LLP. They share a leading word and differ after it, and they are separate registered entities holding different registrations. Nothing about that is improper. It is simply a case where a name read off marketing material will not tell you which of the two you are contracting with, and the registration number will.

By Vidit Kaushik Published 23 September 2026 UP-RERA Agent UPRERAAGT000309/01/2026 ~6 min read

In one paragraph

On the UP-RERA register for Gautam Buddha Nagar the SKA name appears on 5 registrations filed by 5 different registered companies, read 29 July 2026 on Vidastu's mirror of the UP-RERA register, and not one of those five carries the letters SKA in its registered name. Two of them, Prasu Developers LLP and Prasu Home LLP, are separate entities sharing a leading word. On the column buyers fear most the set reads low: 3 of the 5 carry no complaint and the other two carry 2 and 1, against a district median of 15 among filings that carry any at all. A separate company per project is ordinary, lawful practice.

SKA on the register

Registrations carrying the name	5 in Gautam Buddha Nagar, mirror read 29 July 2026 Counted
Distinct registered promoters	5, one per filing Counted
Promoters carrying the SKA letters	0 Counted
Complaints	3 of 5 carry none; the others carry 2 and 1, against a district median of 15 Counted
Extension records	1 across all five, on the oldest filing Counted
Price	Not on the register, so not on this page Not published

Five projects, five companies

The SKA name appears on 5 registrations in Gautam Buddha Nagar, filed between 7 June 2018 and 7 March 2025. They are filed by 5 different registered companies, one each, and none of those five carries the letters SKA in its registered name.

Project and registration	Registered	Promoter of record	Docs	Extensions	Complaints
SKA Metro Ville UPRERAPRJ16460	7 June 2018	Kamroop Infrabuild Pvt Ltd	15	1	2
SKA Divya Towers UPRERAPRJ658704	6 August 2020	JRS Conbuild Pvt Ltd	23	None	None
SKA Orion UPRERAPRJ186008	18 March 2021	Provence Developers Pvt Ltd	23	None	None
SKA Destiny One UPRERAPRJ783951/04/2024	8 April 2024	Prasu Developers LLP	23	None	1
SKA Estate UPRERAPRJ768147/03/2025	7 March 2025	Prasu Home LLP	20	None	None

A separate registered company per project is ordinary, lawful practice. It is common across this register and nothing on this page is a claim about the conduct, standing or capability of any of the five. What it means for a buyer is practical: the company on your agreement is the one that owes you the home, and here it will never be the name you were shown.

What a low complaint count actually looks like

This set is the reason we published the denominator for that column, because the numbers here would be misread without it. 3 of the 5 registrations carry no complaint at all. The other two carry 2 and 1.

Read bare, a buyer sees a complaint and stops. Read against the register, those are very low numbers: across the 697 registrations in this district that carry any complaint at all, the median is 15 and a quarter of them sit above 44. Both counts here are far below the middle of that distribution, and one of the two sits on the oldest filing in the set, which has had the longest to accumulate anything. Complaints accrue with time, which is why 87 percent of the district's 2017 to 2019 filings carry one against 14 percent of the 2025 to 2026 cohort. The full read is in our count of the complaints field across all 966 registrations.

A complaint is an allegation filed with the authority. It records that someone filed, not who was right, and not how the matter ended.

The two names that share a word

The highlighted rows carry a smaller version of a problem we have documented elsewhere on this register. Prasu Developers LLP and Prasu Home LLP are separate registered entities that share a leading word and hold different registrations. Both are properly registered and there is nothing improper in it, but the shared word means a name alone will not tell you which one you are contracting with.

The same difficulty in a sharper form, nine promoters of which two differ by a single word, is on our read of the SVG registrations; the opposite version, where the brand word appears on no promoter at all, is on our read of the DASNAC filings.

The rest of the fields

Document counts run from 15 to 23 against a district median of 21, so the set sits squarely in the ordinary range with no filing unusually thin. One extension record across all five, on SKA Metro Ville, the oldest filing. The denominators behind each of those comparisons are in our read of all 966 filings, and the sequence for reading any filing yourself is our six-step check.

Talk to the desk

Weighing an SKA registration against the other four?

Tell Vidit which project you're actually evaluating — an SKA registration, another Gautam Buddha Nagar registration, or Sector 150's ACE Arte — and he'll walk you through what's confirmed, what's still open, and what to verify yourself, plus arrange a site visit with a verified cost sheet.

+91 95404 45300

Mon–Sat 10–7 · Sunday, phone & WhatsApp only

FAQ

Who is the registered promoter of SKA projects?

There is no single one. The 5 SKA-branded registrations in Gautam Buddha Nagar are filed by 5 different companies, read 29 July 2026: SKA Metro Ville by Kamroop Infrabuild Pvt Ltd; SKA Divya Towers by JRS Conbuild Pvt Ltd; SKA Orion by Provence Developers Pvt Ltd; SKA Destiny One by Prasu Developers LLP; SKA Estate by Prasu Home LLP. None of the five carries the letters SKA in its registered name, so the brand and the promoters share no searchable word and the registration number is the reliable handle.

How many complaints do SKA projects have, and is that a lot?

It is low, and the denominator is the only way to know that. 3 of the 5 registrations carry no complaint at all. The other two carry 2 and 1. Across the whole district, among the 697 registrations that carry any complaint, the median is 15 and the seventy-fifth percentile is 44. So both counts here sit far below the middle of the distribution. A complaint is an allegation filed with the authority, not a finding against anyone.

Which two SKA promoter names are almost the same?

Prasu Developers LLP and Prasu Home LLP. They share a leading word and differ after it, and they are separate registered entities holding different registrations. Nothing about that is improper. It is simply a case where a name read off marketing material will not tell you which of the two you are contracting with, and the registration number will.

Have any SKA projects had their completion date extended?

One record across the five. SKA Metro Ville, the oldest filing in the set at 7 June 2018, carries a single extension; the other four carry none. For context, 526 of the 966 registrations in this district carry at least one extension, and the median extension length is six months. One record on the oldest filing in a set is an unremarkable reading.

Is it normal that the promoter name is different from the brand name?

Yes. Registering a separate company for each project is ordinary, lawful and common across this register, and it is a routine way to finance and ring-fence a development. It matters to a buyer only in a practical way: the company named on your agreement is the entity that owes you the home, so confirm which of the five it is from the registration rather than from a brochure, and check it against your own paperwork word for word before any money moves.

Where do these details come from?

They are read from our mirror of the public UP-RERA register for Gautam Buddha Nagar, 966 registrations in total, read 29 July 2026 and compiled 23 September 2026. Every registration number here can be searched on up-rera.in and the same records are browsable at upreratracker.com. No price appears on this page because the register carries none.

Sources cited above

UP RERA — the public register of projects for Gautam Buddha Nagar, where each of the 5 registration numbers above can be searched and every field verified
upreratracker.com — our mirror of that register, 966 registrations read 29 July 2026, from which this set and the district comparisons were compiled on 23 September 2026

Every field above is read from the register. A separate registered company per project is ordinary and lawful practice, and nothing here is a claim about the conduct, standing or capability of any of the 5 companies named. A complaint is an allegation filed with the authority: the field records that it was filed, not how it was decided, so nothing on this page is a finding against any person or company. No price appears because the register carries none.

Vidit Kaushik

Civil Engineering, BITS Pilani · UP-RERA Agent UPRERAAGT000309/01/2026 · Founder, Vidastu Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Disclosure: This is independent research and general information published by Vidastu Developers Pvt. Ltd. / Vidastu Advisory (sister brand, UP-RERA-registered agent UPRERAAGT000309/01/2026) — an independent channel partner, not the promoters named here, the registered promoter, UP RERA, or any portal named above. Vidastu has no channel-partnership with any of the promoters named on this page and does not sell units in these projects. The page reports fields from the public UP-RERA register and makes no claim about the conduct or capability of any registered entity; a separate company per project is ordinary, lawful practice, and a complaint is an allegation filed rather than a finding. Enquiries are handled by our desk as a separate, clearly-labelled service. Figures are dated and sourced inline; “Reported” means a single named source or a claim we could not independently re-verify against a primary record in this pass, not an unverified guess. Verify any project's RERA registration and promoter entity independently at up-rera.in before making any payment.