The Elysium, Sector 22A: the register read

The filing

The Elysium is registered with UP-RERA as UPRERAPRJ969677/03/2024, filed 2 March 2024 to Omnis Developers Private Limited at Plot No. GH-01, Sector 22A, in Jewar tehsil. It declares completion on 31 August 2028 over a proposed period of 54 months, against a district median of 60 months, and that is still the date the filing carries. No extension, no complaint, 32 documents.

One project is not a warning sign here

The obvious worry about a promoter like this one is that the register shows it holding a single registration. It is worth knowing how common that is before reading anything into it.

315 of the 479 registered promoters in Gautam Buddha Nagar hold exactly one registration, about 65.8 percent. 69 hold two and 39 hold three. A single-filing promoter is the majority case, not the exception.

That follows from how development is commonly structured here rather than from inexperience: a separate registered company per project is ordinary, lawful practice, and it produces exactly this distribution. Elsewhere on this register one brand sits under nine different registered companies, most of which hold a single filing each. So the count tells you about the structure, not about who is behind it.

What it does mean, honestly, is that this company's recorded track record is short. There is no second or third completed filing to read across. So the weight shifts onto the filing in front of you and the documents attached to it.

The projects-count field, and what it actually counts

The register prints a projects count against each promoter, and it counts filings across the state rather than in this district alone. On 49 of the 479 promoters here that stated number differs from the number of Gautam Buddha Nagar rows we hold, which is what you would expect when a promoter has registered elsewhere in Uttar Pradesh.

So the field is a statewide figure. Do not read local experience out of it, and do not read our district count as the promoter's whole record either. Both are true and they measure different things.

Reading the clean columns honestly

No extension, no complaint, a completion date never revised. On a filing registered in 2024 that reads better than it proves. Only 14 of the 97 registrations dated 2025 to 2026 carry a complaint at all, so a clean column on a recent filing is the ordinary case; on the 2017 to 2019 cohort 87 percent carry one. The denominators are in our count of the complaints field.

At 32 documents against a district median of 21 the filing is on the thorough side. Completeness is not quality, so open the sanctioned building plan and the encumbrance details rather than treating the count as reassurance. The denominators for every field are in what a normal filing looks like.

What this page does not tell you

Not the price, because the register carries none. Not build quality, delivery capability or financial standing, because the register records none of those. Not the distance to the airport, because distance is not a register field and a marketing figure would not become one by appearing here. What it gives you is the filing, read against the 966 around it; the sequence for doing that on any other registration is our six-step check, and what the applicant type means is in our read of the type field.